(2012) showed that predicting the stimulus from population activi

(2012) showed that predicting the stimulus from population activity could be done just as well after replacing the firing rates of all their neurons with a few numbers summarizing the activation of each mode. Why would the brain waste valuable resources using a hundred neurons to encode a single number? Although this question cannot be answered at present, this type of organization has some remarkable similarities with some selleckchem long-hypothesized theories of cortical function, which we now describe. One of the most influential theories for cortical function is the “cell assembly hypothesis,” first proposed over half a century ago (Hebb,

1949; see Harris, 2005, for a more recent review). A cell assembly was hypothesized to be a group of neurons that are reciprocally connected by excitatory synapses, so that once a sufficient subset of the assembly fires, the whole assembly will be activated through mutual excitation. In Hebb’s original formulation, assemblies were sculpted by experience-dependent plasticity, with frequently coactivated neurons wired together through what is now called Hebb’s rule. The benefit of this scheme is that when an animal later experiences a stimulus that is similar but not identical

to the stimulus that created the assembly (such as a visual image that is partly occluded), the whole assembly will be reactivated, allowing the animal to respond as it would to the original stimulus. Later computational work made this idea precise by constructing formal models of selleck chemical recurrent network dynamics (e.g., Gardner-Medwin, 1976;

Hopfield, 1982). In these models, the stored assembly patterns heptaminol are “attractors”—stable activity patterns to which network activity evolves. The response modes described by Bathellier et al. (2012) are similar to attractors in their all-or-none nature, their discrete spatial patterns, and the fact that locally, only one mode can be activated at a time. Nevertheless, there are differences between the organization reported by Bathellier et al. (2012) and the simplest attractor models. First, the assemblies of superficial auditory cortex are spatially localized, unlike the disordered patterns typically stored in a Hopfield net; second, it is presumably possible for several spatially separated cortical assemblies to be active simultaneously (as illustrated in Figure 1C); and third, the number of assemblies expressed (1 assembly for at least 100 neurons) is much lower than the predicted capacity of most autoassociative networks (Tsodyks and Feigelman, 1988). Some of these discrepancies are rectified in a class of models known as “bump attractor” networks, in which localized recurrent excitation and lateral inhibition cause firing in localized groups of neurons (Amari, 1977). These models are often proposed as a mechanism to memorize continuous variables such as an animal’s location in space (McNaughton et al., 2006).

Comments are closed.