Then, we form the T  -by-2M2M matrix Gxy=[Gx,Gy]Gxy=[Gx,Gy], with GxGx and GyGy being the anomalies of Gx0 and Gy0, respectively. We decompose GxyGxy into PCs and empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs). The i  th

leading PC, PCi(t  ), represents the temporal evolution (over time period t=1,2,…,Tt=1,2,…,T) of the i  th spatial pattern, EOFi(j)EOFi(j) (i=1,2,…,minT,2Mi=1,2,…,minT,2M; here T>2MT>2M, thus, i=1,2,…,2Mi=1,2,…,2M). Each of the EOFs here is a vector of length 2M2M, with the first half (j=1,2,…,Mj=1,2,…,M) describing the see more spatial pattern of GxGx (i.e., the U component of wind over locations m=1,2,…,Mm=1,2,…,M), and the second half (j=M+1,M+2,…,2Mj=M+1,M+2,…,2M), the pattern of GyGy (i.e., V component of wind over locations m=1,2,…,Mm=1,2,…,M). The product of PCi(t  ) and EOFi(j)EOFi(j) is the i  -th leading component of GxyGxy, denoted as Gxy,iGxy,i.

Then, equation(13) Gxy=∑i=12MGxy,i. Note that the directions of the gradient associated with each EOF are “constant” while its magnitude varies over time. We write “constant” in quotes because depending on the phase of each pattern, the direction may vary 180°°, with the waves generated for each case being in completely opposite directions and affecting a different part of the domain. To account for this variation, we further divide the PCiPCi into their positive and negative phases: PCi+=PCiif PCi>0,0otherwise, equation(14) PCi-=PCiif PCi<0,0otherwise, Secondly, for each chosen leading pattern EOFiEOFi (i=1,2,…,Ni=1,2,…,N, with N<2MN<2M) and each Epigenetics inhibitor phase, we calculate the set of n0n0 points of influence from which swell waves may arrive to a certain point mPmP. As described in Eq. (4), waves can be generated and propagated within a sector ±90°±90° around the wind 17-DMAG (Alvespimycin) HCl direction. Specifically, for each target point mPmP, a point m   is considered as one of influence (m0m0) if the imaginary straight line between points mPmP and m   is within the sector

comprising ±90°±90° around the direction defined by Gxy,iGxy,i at point m   and does not cross any coastline (i.e. it is not interfered by any land obstacle). To account for refraction effects that would make those waves travelling near coast turning towards it, a certain angle tolerance level (5°5°) is used so that wave trains that travel very close to the coast are not accounted for. Obviously, this method simplifies the real world situation, in which wave direction can be further modified by local phenomena like diffraction. Different from Wang et al. (2012), we do not include the leading PCs of SLP anomalies in this study; and we include the leading PCs of GxyGxy in a different way, namely in the term ΔswΔsw, to account for swell wave trains, which is detailed below in this section. Fig. 4 shows an example of the n0n0 selected points of influence for a wave grid point m   and for the first leading pattern EOF1EOF1, which explains 36% of the variability in GxyGxy and can be associated with a typical Mistral event (see Section 2.