In group A (n = 25), BC performed following SC detected 15 additional MI-503 chemical structure polyps, resulted in 107%
additional detection rate. In group B (n = 24) SC performed following BC detected 1 additional polyp, resulted in 11% additional detection rate. Additional detection rate ratio, which represents the probability of missing a polyp during the first procedure with SC compared to the first procedure with BC is 107/11 = 9.72. This ratio is compared to published additional detection rate ratios of 2.56 (PDR) and 1.86 (ADR) in the Third Eye Retroscope and Cap fitted Colonoscopy tandem studies, respectively. Conclusion: BC using the balloon-colonoscope and withdrawal technique is safe, easy to use and demonstrates substantial increase in PDR during colonoscopy. Key Word(s): 1. CRC; 2. Balloon Colonoscope; 3. Polyp Detection; 4. Colonoscopy; Presenting Author: YINXUN HAI Corresponding Author: YINXUN HAI Affiliations: The First Affiliated Hospital of
Harbin Medical STA-9090 concentration University Objective: To discuss the difference between of Sodium Phosphates Oral Solution and Polyethylene Glycol-Electrolyte Powder in intestinal cleaning before colonoscopy. Methods: 107 patients was divided into 2 groups at ramdom, and Analysis the difference after they take Sodium Phosphates Oral Solution (Group A) and Polyethylene Glycol-Electrolyte Powder (Group B) seperatedly. RESULTS: The effective rate of group A and B was 75.68% and 77.14% respectively,
and the amount of residual feces was close. Results: The selleck products effective rate of group A and B was 75.68% and 77.14% respectively, and the amount of residual feces was close. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between two grouops in intestinal cleaning. The application scheme of one bottle of Sodium Phosphates Oral Solution should be promoted clinically. Key Word(s): 1. Intestinal cleaning; 2. Oral Solution; Presenting Author: LULI FENG Corresponding Author: LULI FENG Affiliations: beijing friendship hospital Objective: The success rate of repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after a failed initial attempt is unknown. Our aim was to determine the success rate of repeat ERCP with a failed ERCP procedure. Methods: A review of 168 repeat ERCP procedures was performed at Beijing Frend Hospital affiliated to the Capital medical university in the year2003–2013. Results: 168 endoscopy was repeated after unsuccessful procedures, and access to the desired duct was achieved in 90%(151/168) of repeat attempts. No complications occurred with repeat ERCP. Of the 17 patients who underwent failed repeated ERCP, 6 was not available for the follow-up study, 6 had metastatic cancer, and the other had pancreas divisum. Conclusion: Repeat ERCP yields an 90% success rate. This leads to an overall success rate of 91.0% Key Word(s): 1. ERCP; 2. canulation; 3. endoscopy; 4.