(Emerton, 2014 and Muradian,

2014, but see also Brockington, 2011 and Sullivan, 2012). More interventionist approaches may be required in areas where demand for ecosystem services exceeds the capacity of the natural system to supply these services and/or the natural system is substantially degraded. We anticipate a need for continued evaluation of existing tools and development of new sorts of interventions, ranging from rebuilding of fisheries stocks or repair of habitat to various forms of aquaculture (Bell et al., 2005, Lorenzen et al., 2010b and Merino et al., 2012). Release of hatchery-reared organisms as part of Ion Channel Ligand Library manufacturer a well-researched and planned activity might rebuild fishery populations and the ecosystem services, such as grazing of algae, which they provide. By restoring degraded physical habitat or increasing

limiting habitat beyond its natural extent (e.g. artificial reef construction) availability of critical habitat might even be enhanced. Aquaculture involves multiple interventions in the species’ life cycle and habitat and typically, private ownership of the stock being cultured (Bostock et al., 2010). Given appropriate governance arrangements that allow various levels of exclusive rights and the rapid development of aquaculture technologies for many species, it is AZD6738 mw likely that many forms of aquatic resource management intermediate between capture fisheries and aquaculture will emerge in the tropical coastal oceans, Sorafenib similar to the diversity of systems found in Asian inland waters where such conditions have existed for some time (Amilhat et al., 2009). Some failures of marine resource management can be attributed to inadequately set boundaries. For example,

critical source locations such as spawning grounds may not be protected, or the self-replenishing populations of target species may extend across several management jurisdictions that fail to, or are ineffective in coordinating their management actions (Sale et al., 2005). In addition, climate change is expected in some cases to alter the spatial arrangement of habitats or distributions of species (Cheung et al., 2013). MSP, as visualized here, may facilitate management across boundaries, and the revisions to zoning that will be necessary to correct inadequacies or accommodate change in distribution of habitats. Practical guidelines for MSP exist, centered on process, communication and engagement, tradeoffs and valuation, decision support, and recognition that every situation is different (Lorenzen et al., 2010a, Sanchirico et al., 2010 and Agardy et al., 2012). The application of MSP across tropical coasts should incorporate national aspirations for the various uses of inshore areas, while achieving united, long-term commitments by stakeholders to act as stewards and strengthen management.